Architects and contractors visited the Donley County Courthouse Monday ahead of a new $3.1 million preservation project.
Architect Tracy Hirschman Hutson said most of the work will be focused on repairing locations on the south side of the building where the red facing brick is pulling away from the structure.

Enterprise Photo
Bulges indicating movement in some of those locations were first recognized during the restoration of the 1890 structure two decades ago. Without the budget to properly address the issue, steel helical anchors were sunk into the masonry behind the facing bricks in an attempt to stop the movement. The passage of time as shown that the movement is still ongoing.
Hutson said workers will open up small sections of the brick to determine the overall condition of the wall before moving ahead with removing and resetting the brick in the affected areas.
Monday’s visit was part of the ongoing value engineering taking place with architects and with Premier Commercial Group, the contractor selected to lead project. Premier led restoration work after a 2021 freeze caused major flooding in the building. Hutson said the mason who will lead the work on this project is a third-generation brick and stone mason.
After the brick issues are address, the remaining project funds will be directed to working on the sandstone wainscoting of the building, which has long had problems with spalling or flaking. Hutson said the ideal way to solve that issue is to chisel back about four inches of the affected stone and then install a new stone face in that place.
The Texas Historical Commission’s Courthouse Preservation Program has awarded $2,594,974 for this project with the county matching the grant with $457,937 in its own courthouse maintenance fund.
The Donley County Courthouse is the oldest functioning courthouse in the Texas Panhandle. The building was restored by the Texas Courthouse Preservation Program for $4.2 million in 2003.
The current brick and stone issues were not addressed in 2003 due to budget constraints.
Reader Comments